jdyer (
jdyer
) wrote,
@
2006
-
06
-
22
13:20:00
2006 USPC results (300+ points)
Results are up at the
main page
.
The number of upper-end scores here is stunning, making 350 points not enough to qualify (!). Does anyone know if Jonathan still gets to come along as an alternate?
(
Read 1 comment
) - (
Post a new comment
)
motris
2006-06-22 09:14 pm UTC
(
link
)
The crunch of scores at the top end is rather amazing. As I think you commented elsewhere, there is just too much talent now at the top end for any selection of 4 to really feel fair.
Another interesting note, the new way of grading the "spot the differences" question was essential to the final placements. Wei-Hwa (9) and Zack (8) did not finish that question, but it seems Jonathan did, and I certainly did. I'd say Wei-Hwa did 21.9 out of the 23 puzzles, to be fair in the write-up, but under the old all-or-none scoring for this puzzle, the results would be different.
(
Reply to this
)
(
Read 1 comment
) - (
Post a new comment
)
Explore LJ
Life
Entertainment
Music
Culture
News & Politics
Technology
Post to Journal
All
Entries
Comments
Journals
FAQ
Username:
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
Password:
Remember Me
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…